Letter
No.
65
September
5,
1962
To
the
friends,
may
they
live
forever.
Now
is
the
month
of
Elul
(August/September)
and
it
is
customary
that
even
regular
people,
meaning
those
with
the
view
of
landlords,
engage
in
matters
of
Teshuva
(repentance),
as
well.
What
is
the
difference
between
landlords
and
students
of
Torah?
The
difference
is
that
a
“landlord”
is
one
who
wants
to
feel
that
he
is
the
landlord
in
the
world,
meaning
that
his
presence
in
the
world
will
grow,
that
he
himself
will
be
rewarded
with
a
long
life
and
many
possessions,
which
is
called
the
“persistence
of
reality.”
“Students
of
Torah”
are
those
who
engage
only
in
annulment
of
reality.
He
wants
to
be
annulled
before
the
Creator,
and
his
only
entitlement
to
exist
in
the
world
is
because
the
Creator
wants
it.
But
he
himself
wants
to
be
annulled.
Also,
he
wants
to
bring
all
his
possessions
as
an
offering
to
the
Creator,
and
the
only
reason
he
engages
in
obtaining
possession
is
because
it
is
the
Creator’s
will.
This
is
the
meaning
of
saying
that
the
view
of
landlords
is
opposite
from
the
view
of
Torah,
since
the
view
of
Torah
is
annulment
of
reality,
and
the
view
of
landlords
is
the
persistence
of
reality.
On
the
month
of
Elul,
the
landlords,
too,
understand
that
they
must
engage
in
annulment
of
reality.
Our
sages
said,
“In
a
place
where
those
who
repented
stand,
complete
righteous
cannot
stand.”
We
should
interpret
this
according
to
the
Kabbalah.
It
is
known
that
there
is
a
time
of
Katnut
(infancy/smallness),
called
Kelim
de
Keter
and
Hochma,
which
are
vessels
of
bestowal.
When
all
we
obtain
are
vessels
of
bestowal,
and
bestowal
is
called
“annulment
of
reality,”
when
he
wants
only
to
bestow
upon
the
Creator
and
not
to
receive
anything,
it
is
called
“complete
righteous.”
That
is,
he
has
no
desire
for
himself,
but
all
his
works
are
only
about
how
to
be
annulled
before
the
Creator.
This
is
called
a
“time
of
Katnut,”
since
all
that
shines
in
vessels
of
bestowal
is
Ohr
de
Hassadim,
called
Nefesh
Ruach.
The
time
of
Gadlut
(adulthood/greatness)
is
when
a
person
obtains
the
vessels
of
reception,
which
are
Kelim
of
Bina
and
ZON
that
were
below
the
Parsa
during
the
Katnut.
That
is,
they
departed
from
the
degree
because
of
Malchut,
which
is
the
will
to
receive
that
is
on
them.
In
other
words,
the
Kelim
de
Bina
and
ZON
were
placed
under
the
governance
of
the
will
to
receive
so
it
was
impossible
to
use
them
to
receive
in
order
to
bestow.
Hence,
they
departed
from
the
degree.
During
the
time
of
Gadlut—when
they
improve
their
works—they
return
to
the
degree,
for
then
they
can
engage
in
reception
in
order
to
bestow.
At
that
time
they
use
the
Kelim
de
Bina
and
ZON,
which
are
called
“vessels
of
reception,”
since
now
they
have
returned
to
the
degree.
This
is
called
Gadlut
because
now
the
light
of
Neshama
and
Haya
illuminates,
and
this
is
called
the
“persistence
of
reality,”
since
now
he
engages
in
reception,
except
that
it
is
in
order
to
bestow.
It
follows
from
the
above
that
Katnut
is
called
“complete
righteous,”
which
is
the
annulment
of
reality,
being
Kelim
of
Keter
and
Hochma,
vessels
of
bestowal.
But
the
Kelim
of
Bina
and
ZON,
which
are
vessels
of
reception,
are
regarded
as
the
persistence
of
reality,
which
is
for
obtainment
of
possessions,
and
his
only
wish
is
for
the
possessions
to
grow
and
multiply.
However,
they
come
and
go,
meaning
that
at
the
time
of
Katnut
they
are
outside
of
the
degree,
and
during
the
Gadlut
they
return
to
the
degree,
but
the
light
that
they
draw
is
that
of
Gadlut.
Therefore,
“where
those
who
repented
stand,”
meaning
who
have
light
of
Neshama
and
Haya
through
their
labor,
“complete
righteous
cannot
stand.”
Thus,
one
who
is
complete
righteous,
who
engages
only
with
vessels
of
bestowal,
which
are
Kelim
of
Keter
and
Hochma,
has
only
Katnut,
which
is
Nefesh
and
Ruach,
which
is
only
Ohr
de
Hassadim
and
not
Ohr
Hochma.
And
then
he
is
a
“landlord,”
as
it
is
written,
“A
house
shall
be
built
with
wisdom,”
since
“house”
means
possession,
which
is
the
persistence
of
reality.
This
is
done
specifically
through
the
light
of
Hochma,
which
is
received
specifically
in
vessels
of
reception,
called
Bina
and
ZON,
which
require
Hochma.
But
vessels
of
Keter
and
Hochma
are
regarded
as
vessels
of
bestowal
and
are
considered
annulment
of
reality
because
he
does
not
want
to
receive
anything.
But
in
the
end,
he
is
drawing
only
light
of
Katnut,
called
Ohr
Hassadim.
It
follows
from
all
the
above
that
a
person
should
repent
to
at
least
become
a
“complete
righteous.”
Later,
when
he
reaches
the
degree
of
righteous,
he
should
repent
once
more.
May
the
Creator
help
us
to
at
least
be
complete
righteous.
The
main
thing
in
the
work
is
that
there
is
no
giving
of
half
a
thing
from
heaven.
Otherwise,
it
could
happen
that
if
a
person
repented
half
way
he
would
receive
assistance
from
above
for
half
the
work.
But
since
there
is
no
giving
of
half
a
thing
from
heaven,
a
person
must
pray
to
the
Creator
to
give
him
complete
help.
This
means
that
during
his
prayer,
a
person
sets
what
is
in
his
heart
in
order,
since
prayer
is
work
in
the
heart,
so
a
person
must
decide
that
he
wants
the
Creator
to
give
him
a
desire
to
completely
annul
before
Him,
meaning
not
leave
any
desire
under
his
own
authority,
but
that
all
the
desires
in
him
will
be
only
to
give
glory
to
the
Creator.
Once
he
decides
on
complete
annulment,
he
asks
the
Creator
to
help
him
carry
it
out.
This
means
that
although
in
the
mind
and
the
desire
he
sees
that
the
body
disagrees
with
him
annulling
all
his
desires
before
the
Creator
instead
of
for
his
own
sake,
he
should
pray
to
the
Creator
to
help
him
want
to
annul
before
Him
with
all
the
desires,
leaving
no
desire
for
himself.
This
is
called
a
“complete
prayer,”
meaning
that
he
wishes
that
the
Creator
will
give
him
a
complete
desire
without
any
compromises
to
himself,
and
he
asks
of
the
Creator
to
help
him
always
be
with
his
righteousness.
That
is
a
complete
righteous
means
that
he
has
unwaveringly
determined
to
always
live
in
a
desire
of
a
righteous.
This
is
the
meaning
of
“complete
righteous,”
meaning
that
this
discernment
is
already
completely
resolved
in
him.
“Incomplete”
means
that
he
still
has
work
on
whether
or
not
to
annul
before
Him
with
all
the
desires.
It
follows
that
the
beginning
of
the
work
is
to
be
a
complete
righteous,
and
then
we
arrive
at
the
other
work,
called
“those
who
repent,”
who
restore
the
vessels
of
reception
and
returning
them
to
holiness.
I
would
like
to
present
evidence
that
there
is
no
giving
of
half
a
thing
from
heaven.
See
what
our
sages
said
(Yoma
69b):
“They
said,
‘Since
it
is
a
time
of
good
will,
let
us
ask
for
mercy
on
the
inclination
for
transgression.’
They
asked
for
mercy
and
it
was
granted
to
them.
He
told
them,
‘Note,
if
you
kill
it,
the
world
will
be
ruined.’
They
locked
it
up
for
three
days
and
sought
a
one-day
old
egg
throughout
the
whole
of
the
land
of
Israel,
but
none
was
found.
They
said,
‘What
will
we
do?
If
we
kill
it,
the
world
will
be
destroyed.
If
we
ask
for
mercy
on
half,’
there
is
no
giving
of
half
from
heaven.
They
blinded
its
eyes
with
sand,
and
what
helped
was
that
a
person
does
not
lust
for
his
kin,”
thus
far
their
words.
This
clearly
proves
that
only
wholeness
is
given
from
heaven.
Baal
HaSulam
said
why
this
is
so:
Since
the
Creator
is
whole,
if
He
gives
some
abundance
below,
the
man
below
must
also
receive
wholeness.
Otherwise,
even
if
the
Creator
gives
him,
the
person
cannot
receive
because
he
does
not
have
Kelim
for
wholeness.
Therefore,
before
a
person
qualifies
himself
to
be
fit
to
receive
wholeness,
he
cannot
see
the
length
of
the
way
that
he
has
already
traversed
on
his
way
toward
the
goal
of
wholeness,
for
only
at
the
end
of
his
work
he
will
be
able
to
see,
but
not
midway,
since
he
will
not
be
able
to
receive
His
abundance
before
he
has
complete
Kelim
that
are
ready
for
it.
This
is
why
we
must
brace
ourselves
and
say
that
we
are
already
near
the
king’s
palace,
for
every
penny
joins
into
a
great
amount,
and
perhaps
soon
we
will
see
that
the
gate
is
open
before
us
and
we
will
be
rewarded
with
entering
and
delighting
with
the
king.
We
should
interpret
the
above
words
according
to
the
Kabbalah.
We
know
what
is
written
in
several
places
in
the
Sulam
(Ladder
commentary
on
The
Zohar),
that
first
we
draw
the
right
line,
then
the
left,
and
then
the
middle
line.
And
the
role
of
the
middle
line
is
to
make
the
left
line
illuminate
only
half
a
degree,
called
VAK
de
Hochma,
and
not
to
receive
the
GAR
de
Hochma.
There
is
always
the
question,
“Why
as
soon
as
we
draw
the
left
line,
we
draw
only
half
a
degree,
meaning
VAK
without
GAR?”
Also,
“Why
the
necessity
to
draw
a
complete
degree,
and
only
then,
through
the
middle
line,
we
split
the
degree,
where
the
GAR
de
Hochma
are
removed
upward
and
the
VAK
de
Hochma
are
extended
downward?”
With
the
above
words
we
will
understand
it,
since
there
is
no
giving
of
half
a
thing
from
heaven.
We
will
interpret
this
by
order.
“They
said,
‘Since
it
is
a
time
of
good
will,
let
us
ask
for
mercy
on
the
inclination
for
transgression.’”
All
the
transgressions
extend
from
the
left
line,
meaning
that
they
cancel
the
left
line
through
the
Masach
de
Hirik.
This
is
called
“They
asked
for
mercy
and
it
was
granted
to
them.
He
told
them,”
meaning
the
left
line,
“Note,
if
you
kill
it,
the
world
will
be
ruined.”
That
is,
the
intention
of
creation
was
to
do
good
to
His
creations,
referring
to
Ohr
Hochma,
since
Ohr
Hassadim
is
only
the
light
of
Dvekut
(adhesion),
namely
the
means
by
which
we
can
remove
the
blemish
of
separation,
but
this
is
not
the
light
of
the
purpose
of
creation.
“They
locked
it
up
for
three
days,”
meaning
they
did
not
use
the
left
line,
called
Ohr
Hochma
and
GAR,
“and
sought
a
one-day
old
egg
throughout
the
whole
of
the
land
of
Israel,
but
none
was
found.”
Baal
HaSulam
explained
that
“egg”
means
small
vitality,
when
it
is
known
that
there
is
an
animal
but
it
is
still
not
revealed
outside.
The
beginning
of
the
appearance
is
called
a
“day
old
fledgling,”
meaning
a
new
vitality
of
today
and
not
of
yesterday.
“Throughout
the
whole
of
the
land
of
Israel”
means
those
who
are
using
the
light
of
Hassadim,
which
is
regarded
as
the
“land
of
Israel,”
but
no
vitality,
since
vitality
extends
from
Ohr
Hochma,
as
he
interprets
in
“Inner
Reflection”
of
Part
Two
in
The
Study
of
the
Ten
Sefirot
(items
46-47)
regarding
“Not
Possible
but
Do
Intending,”
that
there
must
be
Hochma
and
vitality.
But
once
the
left
line
has
been
completely
removed,
no
vitality
was
found
throughout
the
land
of
Israel.
“They
said,
‘What
will
we
do?
If
we
kill
it,
the
world
will
be
destroyed.”
That
is,
the
purpose
of
creation
will
not
be
accomplished,
and
this
is
called
the
“destruction
of
the
world.”
“Let
us
ask
for
mercy
on
half,”
meaning
we
will
make
such
a
correction
that
we
draw
Hochma
for
only
half
a
degree,
meaning
to
initially
draw
only
half
a
left
line.
“There
is
no
giving
of
half
from
heaven,”
since
from
above
there
always
comes
a
whole
thing.
“They
blinded
its
eyes
with
sand,”
which
means
that
after
the
correction
of
the
Masach
de
Hirik
we
use
the
light
of
Hochma
only
as
illumination
of
Hochma,
called
“female
light.”
This
is
the
meaning
of
“receiving
and
not
giving
downward.”
Blinding
the
eyes
means
that
that
the
sight
will
not
spread
below,
and
this
is
called
“They
blinded
its
eyes
with
sand,”
as
in
“You
set
a
boundary
that
they
may
not
pass
over.”
The
boundary
becomes
the
sand,
since
the
minute
they
want
to
extend
from
above
downward
the
holy
immediately
becomes
secular
(in
Hebrew,
Hol
means
both
“secular”
and
“sand”).
“What
helped
was
that
a
person
does
not
lust
for
his
kin.”
That
is,
we
use
only
illumination
from
below
upward,
called
“blind,”
for
it
does
not
look
down.
This
will
help
a
person
not
to
lose
the
nearness,
called
Dvekut.
But
if
we
draw
from
above
downward,
it
will
lead
to
removal
and
separation.
This
is
why
the
order
must
be
that
we
must
extend
the
light
of
Hochma
in
wholeness.
The
intention
is
that
they
wanted
to
make
a
correction:
Once
they
made
the
point
of
Hirik
and
cancelled
the
left
line,
they
wanted
to
make
a
correction
that
they
would
not
draw
the
left
line
at
all,
and
there
would
not
be
room
for
the
inclination
for
transgression.
However,
they
saw
that
this
will
mean
the
ruin
of
the
world,
since
“You
have
made
them
all
with
wisdom,”
where
precisely
through
Hochma
[wisdom],
the
world
will
exist,
and
this
is
the
purpose
of
creation.
They
wanted
to
make
a
correction
that
only
half
a
degree
of
Hochma
would
be
drawn
for
fear
that
there
will
be
people
who
will
not
be
able
to
make
the
correction
of
the
middle
line
and
will
fail
with
the
left
line.
However,
“there
is
no
giving
of
half
a
thing
from
heaven,”
so
there
must
be
the
correction
through
three
lines,
as
is
written
in
the
Sulam
in
several
places.