445. No Masach [Screen] in Keter

It was said in several places that there is no Masach in Keter so it can make a Zivug [coupling], since it is completely pure. Thus, why did he write that in the new Partzuf MA there is a Masach of Behina Hey, which is called Keter (see in Panim Meirot, p 221 [in Hebrew]).

Afterward, it emerged, etc., and in the second Behina, the Melech of Gevura, whose level of ten Sefirot reaches Hochma de Bina (Panim Meirot, p 165 [in Hebrew]). It seems as though it should have been written, only up to Bina.

When the Kelim [vessels] of Aleph-Vav-Chaf-Lamed Mem-Samech-Peh-Reish-Tav are in Gadlut [greatness/adulthood], then below, the Kelim of Bet-Dalet-Kof Het-Yod-Hey, the Ketarim [pl. of Keter] stand in two lines, right and left. ZA is in Hesed of Gevura, except for the rest of the Behinot [discernments], which stand in Hesed and Netzah. The ARI writes explicitly that even the Ketarim stand in Hesed and Netzah (Panim Meirot, p 253).